Google+ User Statistics Part II How have the demographics shifted since G+ came out of beta?
Source: http://bimeanalytics.com/blog/google-user-statistics-part-ii/
by Loryfel NYC
Posted 1 year ago
1 Notes
Google+ User Statistics Part II How have the demographics shifted since G+ came out of beta?
Source: http://bimeanalytics.com/blog/google-user-statistics-part-ii/
Posted 1 year ago
Posted 1 year ago
So I decided to have another blog based on the number of hits and comments I got on several posts I had in an old blog of mine.
Since I have a GoDaddy account, I decided to purchase my domain using GoDaddy and use my existing Wordpress hosting service. Everying was going well until I inadvertently allowed the files to be installed in a /wordpress subdirectory. I wanted it to be installed in the root. And silly me I had the main site redirected to the subdirectory.
Sounds ok but then I changed my mind. I decided to uninstall Wordpress and reinstall it again.
Here is the link I found useful:
http://community.godaddy.com/help/article/6824?locale=en&ci=46061
If you did any redirects or fowards, make sure you delete them first before uninstalling and reinstalling Wordpress.
Posted 1 year ago
1 Notes
If there’s any company who can do it, it should be Google. And they are trying to, with Google+. Can it really replace Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr? Can it integrate existing and yet-to-be developed apps to compete with Groupon or Foursquare and integrate it to a mammoth social site such as Google+?

Nobody knows. All I know is that even if a phone has a camera and mp3 player, there are still digital cameras and mp3 players for sale. Even if there is 3-in-1 instant coffee, you can still buy coffee, milk and sugar separately.
IMHO, it depends on the app and the service offered. If the app offers a service and technology that is mature with a well established market, it can weather the “Google” storm. If the service is well used enough to be a standalone service that people just are “wired” to use it separately or if the service has so many features that the aggregator technically just cannot incorporate — think those high end cameras that will be vvery hard to incorporate in a smart phone, then there will always be space for social sites and apps other than those by Google.
Posted 1 year ago
Too much social media. Too much information that is not meaningful to me. When I got two Facebook invites from dogs, (yes dogs), I said, hmm.. time to give Facebook a rest.. for now.

I don’t care if a Facebook “friend” decided to have scrambled eggs for breakfast. It doesn’t do anything to me. I want meaningful information and meaningful communication that gives value to my personal and work life. I don’t have the patience of going over my 500+ friends and filtering feeds and all that stuff. Like most users, I am impatient. And also, like some people, I am selfish. I am past the point of caring about the “social” in social media. I care more about ME - my life, my interests. ME.
Give me meaningful information about ME. NOW.
Yeah, more selfish and more impatient. That’s the Internet user for ya!
Posted 1 year ago
via emergentfutures
138 Notes
Cringely heard a talk by Roger McNamee in which McNamee cites the now-conventional tech viewpoint: Facebook has won.
Again, I’m not saying he’s wrong, but what I took away from this speech was first an image of Microsoft as the Roman Colosseum being mined for marble after the barbarian invasion, and second a sense that while Facebook is certainly a huge social, cultural, and business phenomenon, I just don’t see it being around for very long.
Facebook is a huge success. You can’t argue with 750 million users and growing. And I don’t see Google+ making a big dent in that. What I see instead is more properly the fading of the entire social media category, the victim of an ever-shortening event horizon.
Each era of computing seems to run for about a decade of total dominance by a given platform. Mainframes (1960-1970), minicomputers (1970-1980), character-based PCs (1980-1990), graphical PCs (1990-2000), notebooks (2000-2010), smart phones and tablets (2010-2020?). We could look at this in different ways like how these devices are connected but I don’t think it would make a huge difference.
Now look at the dominant players in each succession – IBM (1960-1985), DEC (1965-1980), Microsoft (1987-2003), Google (2000-2010), Facebook (2007-?). That’s 25 years, 15 years, 15 years, 10 years, and how long will Facebook reign supreme? Not 15 years and I don’t think even 10. I give Facebook seven years or until 2014 to peak.
Does this feel wrong to you? Listen to your gut and I think you’ll agree with me even if we don’t exactly know why.
Roger may not care since he will have already made his Facebook fortune and then some. But I think this foreshortening is important because it makes Facebook the winner, yes, but the winner of what? Super-IPO of the decade? Yes. Dow-30 company of 2025? No.
My interest is in what follows Facebook, which I think must be its disintermediation by all of us reclaiming our personal data, possibly through our embracing the very HTML5 that Roger loves so much. The trend is clear from “the computer is the computer” through “the network is the computer” to what’s next, which I believe is “the data is the computer.”
You’ll notice I didn’t mention Apple. Black swan.
Facebook is the new AOL.
Cringley doesn’t get into my argument about the rise of social operating systems, but he points to Apple, where we just might see it first.
Source: stoweboyd